While my friends dream about buying the latest Bimmer or Porsche, I spend my time fantasizing about kitchen appliances. A Pacojet tops my list, followed by a Thermomix, and a Musso 4080 Dessert Maker. Space and money are my only limitations. Ideally I’d like a kitchen that’s as well equipped as Iron Chef’s kitchen stadium, but realistically it looks like I’ll be hanging out in my 8 by 8 foot kitchen for the foreseeable future.
I’m always on the lookout for unique and useful kitchen appliances, but I don’t have much interest in gimmicky gadgets that I’ll rarely use, or cheap knock-offs that look like they’re about to fall apart. Fuelling my addiction for kitchen utensils, Sam, the eminent author of Becks and Posh, recently asked food bloggers to write about a favourite kitchen utensil. Although Sam’s Utensibility event was on June 27th, I’d still like to write about my Tilia FoodSaver Professional II vacuum sealer.
As its name implies, this appliance saves food by vacuuming out the air from a bag of food before sealing it. With no air around the food, the food deteriorates at a slower rate and stays fresh longer. According to the packaging, the FoodSaver "keeps food fresh 3-5 times longer, prevents freezer burn and saves time and money." The FoodSaver also comes with special wine corks that lets you vacuum the air out of wine bottles, a jar sealing device, and a large storage canister that lets you remove the air around delicate foods like lettuce without crushing it.
Anyway, this is all fine and good. It works great, and I’m pretty sure it does what it claims. But the real reason I bought a vacuum sealer was for sous vide.
Sous vide (which means ‘under vacuum’ in French) is a cooking method that involves heating food in a vacuum bag at a low temperature. It’s usually done by seasoning the meat or produce, placing it into a bag, vacuum sealing it, and placing it into a large pot of water, whose temperature is strictly controlled.
From what I can tell, sous vide has three main advantages over traditional cooking methods such as roasting and poaching:
- Since the juices from the meat or vegetables can’t leak out of the bag, the meat and vegetables retain nearly all their juices and flavour. The result is food that has concentrated flavours and a very moist and juicy texture.
- As long as the water temperature is kept constant, it’s practically impossible to overcook the food because the temperature of the food can never exceed the water temperature. So, if you want to cook a chicken breast to 140F/60C, all you have to do is vacuum seal it and place it in a pot of 140F water until its centre reaches 140F. Since water conducts heat much better than air, the food is evenly cooked throughout.
- Because, there’s no air in the bag, the flavour of seasonings are intensified. The same goes for marinating meat in a vacuum bag, it takes much less time.
So in a nutshell, sous vide is an easy way to prepare flavourful, tender, and juicy food. It can also be combined with other methods. For example, if you want to cook a steak medium rare, all you have to do is cook it in a vacuum bag until its centre reaches 130F/54C, and then give it a quick sear to brown the exterior. While they may not advertise it, many upscale restaurants, including The French Laundry and Charlie Trotter’s use sous vide extensively in their cooking. Daniel Boulud of Daniel in New York cooks his ribs sous vide for 30 hours at 151F/66C and reheats them for five minutes whenever they’re ordered. Many Las Vegas restaurants also keep pre-cooked food in vacuum bags, so that when their customers order rack of lamb at two in the morning, they just warm it up in the water bath, and it’s ready to go.
For home cooks like me, the main disadvantages of sous vide seem to be time and cost. On a normal stovetop, it’s difficult to keep the temperature of the water constant. I usually improvise by continually adding cold water to maintain the same temperature, but if you were to cook something for hours, you’d probably want to buy a circulating water bath or a thermoregulator (the kind used in science labs) so you wouldn’t have to stand beside your stove all day.
For the past couple months, I’ve been experimenting with sous vide salmon. It only takes a few minutes to do, and the results are delicious. I simply season my salmon fillet and place it in a vacuum bag with a teaspoon of olive oil. Then I vacuum it, and place it into a large pot of water at 113F/45C. I try to maintain the water temperature as best I can by adding cold water to the pot, and 20 minutes later, it’s ready to eat.
The salmon is more flavourful and moist than any salmon I’ve ever eaten. From its appearance, you might think that it hasn’t even been cooked, but it flakes beautifully, definitely tastes like cooked salmon, and its texture is nothing less than melt-in-your mouth.
I’ve also tried cooking salmon sous vide at 103F/39C. Its flavour was less rich than the fillet cooked at 113F, but it was still notably firmer and more moist than sashimi. If you do end up trying either of these, I would recommend using sushi-grade fish just to be safe.
So back to the vacuum sealer. It’s essential for sous vide because you want direct heat transfer from the water to the food, and you also don’t want anywhere for the juices to go if they leave the food. The FoodSaver Professional II costs $250 Canadian (about $200 US), and FoodSaver also makes many other models of various sizes and feature sets.
Related Articles
Sealed, Signed and Delivered!
Art Culinaire, Winter 2003
Not so fast...
Saute Wednesday, June 2004

hi clement, wow! have been fascinated by the whole slow cooking by sous vide process but never got round to acquiring a vacuum sealer ;) your post has just convinced me my kitchen is in desperate need of one...
Posted by: J | July 10, 2005 at 11:08 PM
Clement
- thank you - your post is an entire education.
It was kind of you to share your knowledge with us.
I still have so much to learn (and so many things to buy!)
I plan to publish the roundup, finally, on Tuesday Morning PST and I am extremely happy you made it just in time!
-Sam
Posted by: sam | July 10, 2005 at 11:26 PM
Quite frankly I was always a bit skeptical about vacuum sealers, but your post turned it into being intrigued and eager to try it out now. The possibilities seem endless...and the salmon looks simply fantastic!
Posted by: Oliver | July 11, 2005 at 07:20 AM
Clement,
How fun! My cousin-in-law has one of these things and his family uses it all the time. As a result, when my husband and I stayed with them, we watched it being used with interest, but it never seemed really worth it. This new technique for cooking is a much better selling point... thanks for sharing your experience with everyone!!
Posted by: Journey Girl | July 11, 2005 at 03:30 PM
that's it I'm getting one of these vacuum sealers. a friend has one and she lives and dies for it--it's really great when you need to make something complex and in big batches like Oaxacan moles! Sous vide was something I only recently considered--so thanks for the education--I'm sold!
Posted by: Jeanne | July 12, 2005 at 12:15 AM
Hi, clement.
I'm also interested in cook utensil. But there are too various to select them. This is my wistful point.
Posted by: Chocopie | July 13, 2005 at 09:21 AM
I have always wanted one of them!
Posted by: Susan | July 13, 2005 at 07:07 PM
J - It definitely comes in handy. I think Alain Ducasse might have some sous vide recipes in his Grand Livre. If you try some, let me know how they turn out!
Sam - Thanks so much for creating and hosting Utensibility. My kitchen utensil wish list has gotten much longer, all because of you!
Oliver - I think sous vide is a great way to cook. As you said, the possibilities are endless!
Journey Girl - I agree. It's difficult to justify spending so much money on a storage appliance. I probably wouldn't even have considered buying one if not for sous vide.
Jeanne - Wow.. it looks like I'm becoming quite a vacuum sealer salesman. Have fun with your vacuum sealer!
Chocopie - I know. There are so many great kitchen utensils to choose from.
Susan - Go for it!
Posted by: Clement | July 15, 2005 at 10:14 AM
I have a foodsaver in each of my 2 homes and cannot live without them. I'm on my second in one kitchen. I vacuum seal everything--make a batch of creme fraiche and vac it, buy in quantity and vac it, make lemon curd ahead and vac seal it in a quart jar--my family moves fast because if they don't I might vac them.
Posted by: elaine matzner | October 31, 2005 at 06:38 PM
I see u wanna buy a sorbet machine AND a Thermomix... But don't you know that you can actually make wonderful sorbets with the Thermomix as well? I have been using Thermomix for 8 years now and believe me! You really don't need anything else once you put one of those machines on the bank of your kitchen ;)
-Vince, form Italy
Posted by: Vince | November 07, 2005 at 06:44 AM
Good idea:)!
Posted by: Jem | November 30, 2005 at 08:08 PM
Clement, thank you for your article. I purchased a whole NY Strip Loin of grass fed beef from a local cattleman here in MN. Bought a FoodSaver just for freezing it. The trick to cooking grass fed beef is "low and slow". Shortly after working with the beef a local chef spoke w/ me about sous vide. It's the perfect match. Salt and pepper the strip, add some melted butter or fat of your choosing, put in bay leaf, rosemary, maybe some thyme or garlic, vacuum seal and "cook" for 2 hrs at 130 degrees. Sear after it's done and WOW. Make a little pan sauce and you're done. I'm definitely going to try salmon and tuna next. Thanks for you excellent summary.
Posted by: Perry Willis | February 16, 2006 at 05:55 PM
Hi Perry, thanks for sharing your experiences. I'd really like to try cooking meat sous vide more often. One problem I always have is trying to figure out when the centre of the meat has reached the water temperature, but I guess that just takes practice. Good luck with your fish!
Posted by: Clement | February 19, 2006 at 09:06 PM
Hi Perry -
I had a similar question to Clement's ... How do you know when your fish/meat is done?
I just got a vacuum sealer (see blog posts on it) and am experimenting with sous vide salmon tonight.
Posted by: LauraFries.com | March 10, 2006 at 08:19 PM
Cooking sous vide can be dangerous, if not downright deadly. Only specially-trained chefs should experiment with this method of cooking until more is known.
Botulinum, listeria, and other bacteria thrive in anaeorobic (oxygenless)environments, such as inside a vacuum. Cooking food at any less than 60C will not kill these bacteria.
Posted by: Richard | June 05, 2006 at 07:57 PM
Thanks for the article. I bought a foodsaver and tried it tonight with filets of salmon and chilean sea bass. Having had both cooked sous-vide at restaurants before, these felt less than flavorful and far too moist.
Any idea what I may have done wrong? Perhaps using the marinade?
Posted by: John Lynch | August 30, 2007 at 11:43 PM
Only two years to reply to Clement's and LauraFries questions. I got my original times from a chef at a local restaurant. Short of guessing/testing at the time, I was in the dark. I gave up after the beef was gone, since maintaining the temp was just too much work. As everyone knows now, this method has many advocates and recipes are being posted everywhere. Thomas Keller has a book coming out soon on sous vide cooking. ISBN-10: 1579653510 While it will, no doubt, have loads of prep, it should also serve as an excellent guide.
Regarding temperature maintenance: The Wall Street Journal recently had a good article on sous vide. It described how one can use a crockpot (slow cooker) or rice cooker in conjunction with a temperature controller (~$140). I purchased one (Auber-WS) and bingo -- I am able to set the temp and it stays within one degree. Tip: Heat your water before you add it to your cooker, saves tons of time.
My latest is sous vide shrimp. Times vary significantly depending on quantity of shrimp used.
12 ounces wild 26-30 cnt shrimp, peeled and deveined
3/4 tablespoon smoked paprika
Liberal sprinkling of kosher salt
Few grinds of fresh pepper
1/2 to 1 garlic clove run through press
1 tablespoon EVOO
1 tablespoon butter cut into four pieces (optional)
Add all ingredients except butter to a bowl and mix with you hands until shrimp are well coated.
Place shrimp in to prepped bag and add the butter spaced around bag.
Place in cooker bath at 140 degrees F, for 20-25 minutes depending on starting temp of shrimp.
Optional step: heat 1 tablespoon of oil in pan to shimmering just before shrimp are ready.
Remove from cooker and and plate or very quickly saute go get a little fond on the shrimp. I usually eat one of the shrimp before sauteing. If they are totally done, I don't saute, if they can handle a tad more, I give them about 30 seconds in the very hot pan. Do not overcook!
I've made this three times and have not keeled over yet. I take an earlier comment about possible hazards seriously. Creating an anaerobic environment for food is not something to ignore. Do not seal and let sit. I try not to even seal and refridgerate. After the meat or fish has been cooked, I unseal shortly thereafter.
That said, I have not heard of anyone succuming to sous vide food poisoning. While this does not make it impossible, if one takes the simplest of precautions, they should be safe.
Posted by: Perry | September 14, 2008 at 10:55 AM
Found this post while searching for more info for equipment for sous vide. Thought you might be interested in a new appliance created expressly for the home sous vide enthusiast, along with a wealth of information, at http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/good-eating/sous-vide-supreme/
This is not something I benefit from in any way, just thought you/your readers might be interested.
Lots of info/links on the subject in the comments section.
Posted by: Jim | October 02, 2009 at 12:06 PM